Skip to main content

Shifts in network scarcity

When you set up a network, whether it's for home or work, you need to think about how the network's going to be used and which resources are going to be most limited.

For a long time, the relative scarcity looked like this:
  1. Internet bandwidth was very limited
  2. Wireless network bandwidth was somewhat limited
  3. Powerline adapters were faster than wireless, but slower than Ethernet
  4. Wired Ethernet network bandwidth was relatively fast
To get around these limits, you would avoid using the wireless network whenever possible. If you needed to get an internet connection from one end of a house or building to another, you'd try to find a way to use wired whenever possible, even if that meant something like Powerline adapters. Anything to maximize the scarce WiFi bandwidth. Keeping local copies of big files like OS updates also made a lot of sense, as those could take hours to download. I even had a well-tuned QoS (Quality of Service) setup on my old home network to prioritize things like games, video calls, and streaming downloads.

Now, though, I have a fast internet connection, a nice WiFi adapter, and a building with really old wiring. The old wiring renders Powerline nearly useless. So, for me, scarcity looks like this:
  1. Powerline adapters are relatively slow (around 50Mb/s)
  2. Wireless bandwidth is good in the aggregate, but individual devices rarely have enough antennas to break 200Mb/s
  3. Internet bandwidth is almost never limiting at 500Mb/s. 
  4. Wired Ethernet at 1000Mb/s is faster, but not overwhelmingly so.
The result is that there's almost no tuning to be done. Just connect it to the wireless network and go. Old habits die hard, so I've tried tuning a few different things, but nothing really makes it faster than just leaving it alone.

I suppose that it frees up time for other things... like patching all of the internet connected doodads that sprout up like weeds.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Virus By the Numbers

I'm writing this because there's some really insane stuff that's being said by people who should really know better, and I'm sick of discussing it one post or email at a time. So, this is my One Big Post that I'll point people toward rather than bringing it up again and again. In case you haven't noticed, we're in the middle of a pandemic. Just so that we're all using the same terminology:  The virus is Severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 . It's usually abbreviated SARS-CoV-2. It's a brand new kind of Coronavirus, so for a while, before it had this awkward name, people were calling it "novel coronavirus". (For the non-English speakers and D students, "novel" is another word for "new".) The disease that the virus causes is called Coronavirus Disease 2019 , and it's usually abbreviated COVID-19. It's called that because it was discovered in 2019. This came out of nowhere in China in late
Post a Comment
Read more

The Chromecast conceptual model

Google makes a device called Chromecast . It's a relatively inexpensive way to turn any TV into a "Smart" TV capable of playing movies or music. It's a clever bit of engineering, but I've run into a few people who have trouble understanding how they work. The key thing to understand is that the Chromecast is the device that's actually receiving and playing the movie (or whatever), and your phone is just the remote. Here's how the process works at a high level: You start watching a video on Youtube 30 seconds in, you decide that you'd like to watch the rest on your TV, so you press the "Cast" button. Your phone stops playing and tells the Chromecast "Get this video directly from Youtube and start playing at the 0:30 mark"  When your phone initially asks the Chromecast to start playing, it also specifies a "default thing" to do when the Chromecast is finished. If the Chromecast is playing a Youtube video, it might
Post a Comment
Read more

Audio upgrade: Schiit Fulla 2

I recently purchased a Schiit Fulla 2 . I was on the fence about it for a long time, but it's held up well, and I'm pretty happy with it. So, here's a small product review. I should probably mention that I'm generally skeptical about "audiophile" anything. I've known too many people who spend way too much money on voodoo like "oxygen-free speaker cables". This makes me reluctant to trust reviews or spend money on anything that I can't test for myself.  I've heard good audio. I go to concerts. I know what music is  supposed to  sound like, and it wasn't what I was getting from any of my computers, even with decent headphones, lossless audio codecs, etc. On the other hand, we have some  Sonos speakers , and with those speakers and a good audio source, music can sound really good. Since I wasn't getting that level of quality at the computer, it meant that there was something between the computer and my ears that was part of
Post a Comment
Read more